4 Cases of MO interactions with IV
Case 1:
Moderator and IV are Categorical
- A dichotomous independent variable’s effect on the dependent variable varies as a function of another dichotomy
- 2 x 2 ANOVA
- The moderation is indicated by the interaction
IV – Level of Education
DV – Income
Case 2:
Moderator is Categorical and IV is Continuos
- Deficiency: Assumes that the IV has equal variance at each level of the moderator
- The effect of IV on DV is tested using unstandardized regression coefficient. The regression coefficients are then tested for differences (see formula, Cohen & Cohen, 1983, p.56)
- Reliabilities should be tested foe the level of moderation, and slopes should be disattenuated
Case 3:
Moderator is continuous and IV is categorical
- We must know a prior how the effect of the IV varies as a function of the moderator
(1) Linear Function
(2) Step Function
(3) Quadratic Function
- Example: IV: Rational VAS Fear – arousing attitude change. Moderator: Intelligence (IQ test)
Case 4:
Moderator and IV are continuous
- One can dichotomise the moderator at the point where the step tales place (step function)
- The measure of the effect of IV is a regression coefficient
- If the effect of IV (X) on the DV (Y) varies linearly or quadratically with respect to moderator (Z), the moderator squared is introduced
- The XZ term is tested by moderation
Moderator in Regression Analysis:
When a variable interacts with a predictor to change the relationship between that predictor and the outcome variable: increase, decrease or change direction (e.g. positive or negative)
Assessing for moderation effects depends on the characteristics of your predictor and moderator:
- If both are categorical, either factorial, ANOVA or regression (MR used for examining shared variance)
- If at least one is an interval/continuous variable, use multiple regression methods
Sources from:
Professor Dr. Dileep Workshop on Role of Theory, Moderation & Mediation on
3 August 2019.

Comments
Post a Comment