Moderator Variable (Scenario)
Scenario No 1: Moderator as an Antecedent or Independent variable Tested in Past Studies
Best of Service quality extended to a
customer resulted to better visitor intention to visit to the same shop, nevertheless
there is unexpected weak correlation and recorded an inconsistent finding for
antecedent and the outcome of study.
The situation can be altered If researcher
first get direct relationship. By looking on direct relationship of Service
quality and Intention to revisit, a predictability of 60% is recorded.
After getting the predictability,
researcher need to look in-depth to the next line of inconclusive relationship,
take an example of service quality is extended by market quality and intention
to revisit, when considering gender (male or female) what kind of change can be expected?
What kind of findings will be?
Here researcher need to get literature
of gender differences which is happening in Malaysia and other different
countries in which the studies connected with gender on intention to revisit. These
literatures, researcher need to bring down in thesis then only can be applied
as variable. Even if researcher can’t bring male or female differences, do
there any literatures to substantiate gender variation?
Researcher need to get all literatures
prior concluding that if these differences exists over there, what is happening
in the Malaysian context?
Justification by researcher: Based on
Literature review, nobody has conducted the research by adding gender as moderator in Malaysia or such observation are not
consistent in Malaysia, then only there is a gap. To get the variable into the
picture, never try to put any variable into the research frame unless it is
supported by a theory.
In his or her justification, researcher
mentions that direct relationship (3 IVs & 1 DV) says around 30% predictability,
but after introducing Innovative Marketing into the research frame, the relationship
is going up (correlations), then the predictability going up to 72%.
Example 2:
Theoretical Frame Incorporating both Motivation Theory & Hofstede's national cultures
Note: Relationship of Service Quality
and Intention to Revisit is coming from Expectancy
Disconfirmation Theory (Oliver, 1977):
Scenario
2: Moderating variable can also be tested for purpose of new theory
explanation, new theory integration, new concept integration
Example 1:
Researcher brings into the picture a new
factor. Based on Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), we look at Attitude, Subjective
Norm and Perceive Behavioural Control, these are the 3 variables known as Independent
Variables (IV) influencing Depending Variable (Intention to purchase) but the
issue occurred when researcher include a variable called innovative marketing
and this innovative marketing he or she add in as moderator, the above relationship
of 3 IVs and 1 DVs is under a theory of TPB. Researcher introduces a new
variable based on literature that indicate innovative marketing could enhance
the purchase intention. Means that it can moderate the influence of Attitude, Subjective
Norm and Perceived Behavioural Control.
Theory of Planned Behaviour
Diffusion
of Innovation Theory
Means that the marketer and advertiser, CEO
or CMO should focus more on Innovative Marketing to enhance the business as
suggestion by researcher upon completion of his or her thesis.
By incorporating new variable –
Innovative Marketing, researcher need to look into different theory to support
his or her research frame. Additional theory to refer is Innovation Diffusion Theory.
In order to explain this frame, 2 theories are required, Innovation Diffusion Theory
+ Theory of Planned Behaviour. This Innovation diffusion theory comes only when
a moderating variable inserted into the frame.
In the Diffusion of Innovations, Everett Rogers describes a product's innovation life cycle. In this cycle thery he distinguishes five stages in which the product may find itself with five different user groups that accept the product or idea. These determine the success of a product. Through his theiry it becomes clear how a product or idea develops among the users. Depending on the stage of the product, several adjustments take place, for exmaple much or little promotion or a high or low price
Theoretical
Frame Incorporating both TPB & Innovation Diffusion Theory
Example 2:
Researcher field in the research gap by
investigating how national culture moderate the influence of different job
characteristics on job satisfactions, At the moment people study only job
characteristics and job satisfactions but nobody had studied incorporating
national culture
When job characteristics and job
satisfactions are introduced, motivational theory are coming out. But when researcher
intend to bring down national culture then culture theory will be coming into
the picture, as such it can enhance the theoretical explanation. A strong
theoretical support is required to justify inclusion of moderating variable
Theoretical Frame Incorporating both Motivation Theory & Hofstede's national cultures
Hofstede's national cultures is used when discussing the types of culture and the
possibility for culture clashes. Although Hofstede’s work was specifically in
relation to national cultures, you can adapt this framework to discuss how and
why the cultures of different organisations may differ, and why employees from
different organisations may experience cultural clashes when working together. This could be useful when considering:
· Global
businesses and employees within these communicating with each other and working
together
·
The
problems of mergers and takeovers
·
Difficulties
entering overseas markets.










Comments
Post a Comment