9 Reasons For Including Moderator
- The investigation of moderating variables acknowledges the complexity of behaviour, experience & relationship as each individual is not the same.
- This focus on Individual vs. group effects is more commonly known as tendency for researcher to be either lumpers or splitters (Simpson, 1945)
- Lumpers seek to group individuals and focus on how persons are the same. Splitters, in contrast look for differences among groups
Situation:
When researcher performs coding process (qualitative studies), lumper
and split coding are there. When researcher performs an interview process, he
or she gets overall interview manuscripts and read line by line as a whole.
This is called lumper coding.
Split coding means each line in the paragraph, researcher differentiates
and extracts meaning out of it. Take an example when researcher makes a study
in Malaysia, within peninsular - Selangor, Johor or Penang, all these locations
we expect people with different behaviour e.g. dialect, perception and economic
level. As such researcher can't expect same individual perception towards an
issue when considering different location. Researcher need to expect amid
complexity.
Generally, a researcher for moderator need to understand group
differences, in other words within a group (e.g. a total of 300 - 400 sample
size) when researcher go in-depth looking at gender differences, urban or rural
differences, employed or unemployed differences, married or unmarried
differences, All these differences helping towards getting more explanation on
the issue.
Example:
Technology Advancement leading towards
Business Performance:
When
researcher integrates all types of firm and make an analysis, researcher get
around 40% predictability, but the question is that if researcher try to segregate
and look for micro, small, medium or large enterprise respectively towards
business performance, can he or she connect each of this firm to business
performance? To find the exact truth is to segregate
each of the firm to business performance. In most cases, Micro enterprises very less technology
needed, they don’t use but the medium they have used it, so the truth is more
connected to medium in comparison to small.
2)
Manipulation Check
- If there is an additional experimental factor picked so that an observed relation is differentially observed across subgroups, then the intervention effect is a test of the intervention theory. In other words, Moderation analysis provides a way to whether intervention effect has similar effect across different group
3) Generalisability of Results
· Moderation analysis provides a way to test whether an intervention has
similar effects
across sub-groups
· To demonstrate that intervention effects are obtained for males and
females if the program would be disseminated to a whole group containing males
and females
· Similarly, the consistency of an intervention effect across subgroups
demonstrates important information about the generalisability of an
intervention
4) Specificity of Effect
· Another
factor to be considered in moderation is specificity of effect, in contrast to
generalizability, it is important to identify group which has greater effect or
no effect, male and female differences, which one has more effect or less
effect, there is exactly the truth lies. This information will then be used for
target group’s intervention. Tailoring of intervention possible.
5) Identification
of iatrogenic effects in subgroups
· Moderation
analysis can be used to identify subgroups for which effects are
counterproductive
· It
is possible that there will be subgroups for which the intervention causes more
negative outcomes
· Taking
an example some policy implemented by the government or likewise, the purpose
of the male and female may be varied, if researcher try to mix up, he or she
will be getting moderate effect of the policy. Nevertheless, if he or she try to
segregate these groups, for instance to look at how’s female policy looking
upon or how the policy male looking upon, researcher can see a big different
between 2 groups. Female may not accept this kind of policy at all. Problem
happen was went there is mix up, it moved towards mix opinion. Then
investigation will be having lack of intervention effect.
6) Measurement Improvement
· Lack of a moderating variable effect may be due to poor measurement of
the moderator variable
· Many moderator variables have reasonably good reliability such as age,
sex and ethnicity
· But other measurement limitations such as risk-taking propensity or
impulsivity.
7) Investigation of lack of an intervention effect
· If there are two groups that are affected by an intervention in opposite
ways, the overall effect will be nonsignificant even if there is a statistically
significant effect in both groups albeit opposite.
· Without investigation of moderating variables, these types of effect
would not be observable
· In addition, before abandoning an intervention or area of research it is
useful to investigate subgroups for any intervention effect
· Of course, this type of exploratory must consider the possibility of
multiplicity where by testing more effects will lead to findings effects by
chance alone
8) Moderators as a test of theory
· There are situations when intervention effects may be theoretically
expected in one group and not another
· For example, there may be different social tobacco intervention effects
for boys versus girls because reasons for smoking may differ across sex
· In this way, mediation and moderation may be combined if it is expected
that a theoretical mediating process would be present in one group but not in
another group
9) Practical Implications
· If moderator effects are found, then
decisions about intervention delivery may depend on this information
· If intervention effect is positive at
all levels of the moderator, then it is reasonable to deliver the whole program
· If intervention effect is observed for
one group and not another, it may be useful to deliver the program to the group
where it had success and develop a new intervention for other groups
Sources from: Professor Dr. Dileep Workshop on Role of Theory,
Moderation & Mediation on 3 August 2019.

Comments
Post a Comment